Popular Posts
-
The GBE2 subject this week is SUCCESS: What does my trusty Chambers English Dictionary make of this? Briefly, fortune (good or bad), ...
-
Wishing all my blogging friends and their families from around the world a very Merry Christmas and a most happy New Year. http://www....
-
Oil production in NZ surge... Oil production is rising sharply in New Zealand, but with qualified success. Figures from the Ministry of Econ...
-
From Huttriver8 comes this interesting story: Facebook is allegedly red-faced after a dirty tricks campaign against Google. The w...
-
Share PETER MEECHAM/ Fairfax NZ Tame Iti Activist Tame It...
-
Lady Gaga's new single Judas outrages Catholic leaders... The 25-year-old songstress - who released the track yesterday - sings that...
-
A married couple is sleeping when the phone rings at 3 a.m. The wife picks up the phone and, after a few seconds, replies,"How am I...
-
A new report out just a couple of hours ago would suggest that Somali pirates are getting some of their own treatment: BOSSASO, Somalia (Reu...
-
Seamus Heaney (b. 1939), Irish writer (Crop) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) A doctor wanted to get off work and go hunting, so he approach...
-
Japanese green tea under direct threat from nuclear radiation... Because of the fall-out from the Fukushima nuclear plan...
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Kiwis getting concerned at new internet laws...
A number of New Zealanders are becoming concerned about the forthcoming Copyright Amendment Act, which allows internet service providers in New Zealand the right to arbitarily cut off users who may only be 'accused' of making an illegal download from the internet.
Around 200 protesters have congregated outside Parliament voicing their opposition to new copyright laws. A 10,000 signature will also be presented to Parliament.
Creative Freedom Foundation spokeswoman Bronwyn Holloway-Smith says the law is pretty vague and could have serious implications for all computer users.
"There's nothing in the law that addresses a situation where there are shared users on a single connection. There's nothing that addresses the fact that one in four computers are infected with viruses that could be downloading and on sending copyright infringing material - without the owner knowing about it."
Bronwyn Holloway-Smith is taking heart at indications the Government may address the problems, but maintains the law must be repealed.
Telecommunications Users Association chief executive Ernie Newman says it is a bad piece of law, trying to protect one group by taking away the rights of another. "The act is inherently unbalanced. It assumes guilt. It gives the party concerned very little or no opportunity to deny that."
Mr Newman says what is frightening is the lack of understanding among businesses about the obligations they will face next week if it comes into effect.
There have not been any suggestion that the law may be amended at this stage.
This new Act would give internet service providers similar powers to Google Adsense who disable internet users accounts without any explanation at all.
Acknowledgements to NZ City.
Internet Service Provider
LATE NEWS: This law is to be reviewed by the NZ Government. Protest action has been successful. I will write and review the situation as it comes to hand.
Peter
© 2009 New Zealand City Ltd
Labels:
accusations,
ACT of Parliament,
downloads,
i s p
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
@Kiwi Riverman: Mr. Newman is right, it assumes guilt. I hope you can resist this legislation. We had a revolution over just this sort of thing. Do guys (mugs?) know Glenn Beck? He wouldn't like this at all. Glenn is an entertainer that comments on the news. He will tell you he started out as a disc jockey.
Me thinks this government wants this bill passed for some unknown reason?
Post a Comment