Popular Posts
-
Japanese green tea under direct threat from nuclear radiation... Because of the fall-out from the Fukushima nuclear plan...
-
From Huttriver8 comes this interesting story: Facebook is allegedly red-faced after a dirty tricks campaign against Google. The w...
-
The GBE2 subject this week is SUCCESS: What does my trusty Chambers English Dictionary make of this? Briefly, fortune (good or bad), ...
-
Share PETER MEECHAM/ Fairfax NZ Tame Iti Activist Tame It...
-
Lady Gaga's new single Judas outrages Catholic leaders... The 25-year-old songstress - who released the track yesterday - sings that...
-
Image via Wikipedia Working for the man We have all had to work for the man in one category or another in our lives to su...
-
Wishing all my blogging friends and their families from around the world a very Merry Christmas and a most happy New Year. http://www....
-
Oil production in NZ surge... Oil production is rising sharply in New Zealand, but with qualified success. Figures from the Ministry of Econ...
-
A new report out just a couple of hours ago would suggest that Somali pirates are getting some of their own treatment: BOSSASO, Somalia (Reu...
-
Wassup Funnies: Aunty Acid, Sex in the hospital and Mr Bean... http://wassupblog.com/aunty-acid-sex-in-the-hospital-mr-bean/#axzz29Jl...
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Where's the justice here...
Berryman bridge case struck out of court. Where's the justice here?
The High Court has struck out a claim for damages in the Berryman's bridge case.
The army-built bridge leading to Keith and Margaret Berryman's King Country farm collapsed in 1994, killing beekeeper Ken Richards.
The Berrymans wanted to sue the army, claiming it acted maliciously in wake of the bridge collapse by withholding information from a coroner's inquest.
The Court of Appeal allowed the claim to go ahead in 2008 but the High Court issued a ruling on Thursday saying it must be struck out.
Justice MacKenzie says the proceeding, which was filed in 2006, did not commence within six years of the cause of the alleged misfeasance.
He says there is no public interest in allowing the matters to be further litigated and it is not in the Berrymans' interests to allow them to continue with a claim that is bound to fail.
Acknowledgements: Radio New Zealand 2009
Labels:
berrymans,
courtcase,
damages,
high court,
nz,
struck out
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment